E-ISSN: 1309-5749 | ISSN: 1018-8681 | Join E-mail List | Contact | Twitter
Reliability and validity study of the Turkish form of the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS-TR)
1Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Istanbul, Turkiye; Istanbul Erenkoy Training and Research Hospital for Mental and Nervous Disorders, Cekmekoy Community Mental Health Center, Istanbul, Turkiye
2Istanbul Erenkoy Training and Research Hospital for Mental and Nervous Disorders, Cekmekoy Community Mental Health Center, Istanbul, Turkiye
3Texas Tech University, Department of Educational Psychology, Lubbock, Texas, USA
4Tokat Turhal State Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Tokat, Turkiye
5Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Manisa, Turkiye
Dusunen Adam Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences 2024; 37(2): 85-93 DOI: 10.14744/DAJPNS.2024.00243
Full Text PDF

Abstract

Objective: Anhedonia, characterized by a diminished capacity to experience pleasure, is a transdiagnostic concept observed across various neuropsychiatric conditions. It can be categorized into two domains based on the timing of pleasurable events: in-the-moment (consummatory) pleasure and anticipatory pleasure. The Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) assesses these temporal aspects of pleasure. Having received a global response, it has been translated into many languages. This study aims to adapt and validate the TEPS for Turkish use (TEPS-TR).
Method: Data were collected from 222 university students using convenience sampling, following ethical approval. The translated TEPS underwent reliability and validity analyses to assess its applicability and consistency. A set of measures assessing different aspects of anhedonia and apathy was co-administered to evaluate the scale’s concurrent validity.
Results: The Cronbach’s α coefficient for the 15-item TEPS-TR was 0.823 for the full scale, 0.767 for the anticipatory subscale, and 0.746 for the consummatory subscale. Principal component analyses yielded three factors, explaining 48.87% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis, performed to evaluate the construct validity of the TEPS-TR, indicated an acceptable fit. The total and subscale scores of the TEPS-TR significantly correlated to varying degrees with all scales included in the analysis, except for the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).
Conclusion: The findings indicate that the TEPS-TR exhibits good reliability and validity in assessing anhedonia. However, further exploration into the distinct elements of anticipatory and consummatory pleasure within clinical populations is needed.